Break-Even Calculator

You passed. Now how many months until you've actually recouped everything you spent? Monte Carlo with blowup risk and reset costs baked in.

90% SPLIT

100% of first $25K, then 90/10

Cost & Payout

True cost seeded from preset — override with the output of the True Cost Calculator for your specific attempt plan and fee profile.

Blowup Risk

20%/mo
24 months
Median Break-Even
1 months
Naïve break-even (no blowups, no resets, no refund): 0.2 months
P10 (OPTIMISTIC)
1 mo
P50 (MEDIAN)
1 mo
P90 (PESSIMISTIC)
2 mo
NEVER RECOUPED
0%
MEDIAN COST @ END
$954
MEDIAN PAYOUT @ END
$57,000
Cumulative Payout vs. Cumulative Cost1,000 Monte Carlo paths

How It Works

Simulation Logic

break_even_month = first month where cumulative_payout ≥ cumulative_cost
Each month, roll against p_blowup:
  if blowup & reset → cost += reset_fee, no payout this month
  if blowup & quit → path locked, no further earnings
  otherwise → payout += monthly_payout (and apply refund on first such month)
Run 1,000 paths, aggregate percentiles.

Naïve break-even is almost always wrong. The obvious calculation — true cost divided by monthly payout — assumes you never blow up, never reset, and earn consistently every month. At your current inputs that gives 0.2 months. The Monte Carlo version accounts for the reality that at your 20% monthly blowup rate, roughly 1 in 5 months ends in a blowup, and each blowup either pauses earnings for a month (reset) or ends them entirely (quit). The spread between your naïve number and the P50 is the cost of ignoring variance.

The P10-to-P90 spread measures how lucky vs. unlucky matters. A tight spread means outcomes are predictable — break-even will land near P50 regardless of month-to-month variance. A wide spread means the blowup lottery dominates. If your P90 is double your P10, the honest answer is "I don't really know when I'll break even" — and that uncertainty should feed back into whether this firm and account size is the right bet in the first place.

Reset vs. quit is a strategy question, not a math question. Reset mode is the right model if you believe your edge is real and blowups come from bad luck or inevitable drawdowns. Quit mode is right if a blowup usually reveals a flaw in your setup — bad risk management, an untested strategy, emotional trading. The research suggests most funded traders would be better off in quit mode than they think, because resets compound costs faster than edges compound profits.

The "never break even" percentage is the sharpest signal on this page. If 30% of paths never recoup their cost within the time horizon, that's the probability you're donating money to the firm regardless of how passing feels. This number climbs fast with higher blowup rates and higher true costs, and it's the number that makes or breaks the economics of any "cheap challenge, high reset fee" plan.

What this tool does NOT model: time-varying payout amounts (the simulation treats monthly payout as constant), payout caps and cycle limits, consistency-rule failures that block specific payouts, payout frequency (treated as monthly), or the probability you voluntarily stop trading before the horizon for unrelated reasons. Treat the headline number as a directional estimate — the shape of the fan chart and the never-break-even percentage carry more information than any single month figure.

Reading the Chart

━━
Median Payout (P50)
The middle scenario. Half of all simulated paths earn more than this by month M, half earn less. The line you track.
░░
P10 / P90 Band
The shaded area covers 80% of likely outcomes. Wide band = high variance from blowup luck. Narrow = predictable.
━━
Cumulative Cost
Starts at your true cost and climbs with each reset. Where this line crosses the payout line is your break-even month.
┈┈
Cost P90 (pessimistic)
Cost under the unluckiest 10% of scenarios — multiple resets compounding. Only appears when reset mode is on and blowups are frequent.
BE P50 Marker
Where the median payout line crosses cost — your expected break-even point.

Next Steps

Break-even answers "when do I stop losing money?" — but it depends on three inputs that this calculator treats as given. The True Cost Calculator gives you a sharper number for the cost side. The EV Calculator evaluates whether you should even attempt the challenge in the first place. And the Trailing Drawdown Visualizer informs the blowup probability input — different drawdown mechanics make blowups more or less likely for the same strategy.

🏠
propfirmsdata.comHome
Full calculator suite, firm database, and rule-change tracker. Every tool you need to evaluate prop firms with data, not marketing.
💰
True Cost CalculatorRefine cost input
Full all-in cost breakdown — challenge, resets, activation, monthly platform, data, minus refunds. Feed the output back into this calculator.
🎯
EV CalculatorPre-purchase decision
Before you worry about break-even timing, check if the challenge is +EV at all. Combines pass rate, funded lifetime, and true cost into one dollar number.
📉
Trailing Drawdown VisualizerRefine blowup risk
See how each firm's drawdown type would have treated your actual trading sequence. Directly informs the monthly blowup probability here.
Educational purposes only — verify all rules and fees at the firm's website before purchasing.
Simulation uses a seeded PRNG so results are reproducible. 1,000 paths per scenario. Last verified: April 2026.
PROPFIRMSDATA.COM